IED course icon
IED Unit 0 • Lesson 0.4

Engineering Design Process

Focus Question: How do engineers use testing and revision to improve a design?

Mission Briefing

Today’s Plan

Complete a fast, measurable design cycle and create the first numbered notebook artifact.

Learning Targets

  • Describe the engineering design process as a flexible cycle.
  • Apply the cycle to a paper-airplane distance challenge.
  • Use test evidence to revise a design.

Success Looks Like…

You can explain what changed between Version 1 and Version 2 and support the change with test data.

Core habit: A revision needs a reason, and the reason should come from evidence.
Opening prompt
Design cycle
Challenge briefing
Version 1
Version 2
Compare evidence
Exit
Opening Prompt

Is the first design supposed to be the best?

Engineers use early versions to create evidence—not to prove they were right immediately.

Quick class share: Why might a first prototype be useful even when it does not perform well?

Reveal the design-process idea

The design process is a flexible cycle.

Engineers define, generate, develop, construct, test, evaluate, revise, and communicate—often moving backward and forward as evidence changes.

Design Cycle

A flexible process—not a rigid checklist

Different projects may repeat or combine stages.

1

Define

Clarify the goal, criteria, and constraints.

2

Generate

Create multiple possible solutions.

3

Develop

Select and plan a promising approach.

4

Construct + Test

Build a prototype and collect evidence.

5

Evaluate + Revise

Compare results and improve the design.

6

Present

Communicate the design and next steps.

Design Sprint

Paper Airplane Distance Challenge

Complete one fast cycle with measurable evidence.

Version 1
  1. Create one individual concept sketch.
  2. Choose one team Version 1 concept.
  3. Build with one sheet of paper.
  4. Complete one official distance test.
  5. Record the distance to first ground contact.
Version 2
  1. Study Version 1 evidence.
  2. Choose one deliberate revision.
  3. Build with one new sheet of paper.
  4. Complete one official distance test.
  5. Compare the two results.
Measurement: Record distance from the launch line to the first ground contact in feet and inches.
Decision Challenge

Which revision is evidence-based?

Vote before revealing the answer.

Version 1 curves sharply left and lands after 18 ft. Which Version 2 decision is strongest?

  1. AChange several folds at once because more change is better.
  2. BAdjust the uneven wing fold, keep other features the same, and retest.
  3. CDecorate the airplane so it looks faster.
  4. DBuild a completely different airplane without recording Version 1.
Reveal the evidence-based revision

Best answer: B

The observed left curve points to an asymmetry. Changing one likely cause makes the next test easier to interpret.

Strong revision: observed problem → targeted change → new test.
Evidence Check

Leave with a complete design-process artifact

Your worksheet becomes the first numbered notebook document.

Mission Debrief

What You Submit

Submit the evidence from the full design cycle.

Design Process Evidence

Paper Airplane Design Process Worksheet

  • The completed paper-airplane design-process worksheet including both test versions and the revision conclusion.
Next Mission

Lesson 0.5

Engineering Notebook & Documentation Basics

Open Lesson 0.5
Resources

Lesson 0.4 Resources

Use only the files and references that support today’s work.

PowerPoint

Lesson 0.4 Student Presentation

Google Slides-friendly 16:9 lesson deck with question slides followed by separate answer-reveal slides.

Worksheet

Paper Airplane Design Process Worksheet

Use this worksheet for concepts, test data, revision notes, and comparison evidence.

Optional Video

STEMonstrations: Engineering Design Process

A short visual explanation of defining, testing, and improving engineering solutions.

Course Hub

Introduction to Engineering Design

Return to the IED course hub for units, resources, certifications, and current course information.