POE course icon
POE Unit 0 • Lesson 0.5

Evaluate & Develop

Focus question: How can we use engineering criteria to select the CubeSat concept most likely to be light, strong, and manufacturable?

Challenge Rules

CubeSat Lightweight Structure Challenge

Every team works inside the same architecture and material limits. Your engineering advantage comes from how efficiently you use them.

Competition Objective

Pass first. Then weigh in.

Structural qualification is pass/fail. Among the structures that pass every requirement, the lowest total assembled mass wins.

Fixed Architecture
  • Maximum assembled envelope: 4 in × 4 in × 4 in, including hardware.
  • Top and bottom: laser cut from the team’s single 4 in × 12 in × 1/8 in acrylic sheet.
  • Sides: remain open; no side panels.
  • Primary frame: 3D printed using the same teacher-selected filament material for every team.
  • Assembly: M3 screws for all primary structural connections; structural glue is not permitted.
Manufacturing Limits
  • Serviceability: the structure must be able to be disassembled and reassembled with normal hand tools.
  • Competition: the lightest structure that passes every qualification requirement wins.
Lesson Targets

What You Will Be Able to Do

Learning Target

I can compare concepts with a weighted decision matrix and develop the strongest option into a detailed design direction.

Evidence

Decision Matrix + selected concept + detailed annotated sketch

Success Looks Like

The selected concept is supported by evidence-based scoring and includes enough dimensions and connection detail to begin CAD.

Activity Flow

How Today Advances the CubeSat

1. Establish selection criteria

Use strength, predicted mass, manufacturability, assembly access, and payload space.

2. Score all three concepts

Complete a weighted decision matrix and justify the scores.

3. Develop the winner

Add dimensions, M3 strategy, plate geometry, and frame details to the selected concept.

Evaluation

Recommended Decision Criteria

Teams may adjust weights with teacher approval, but the competition objective must remain dominant.

Predicted Structural Strength

Does the load path make sense? Are M3 attachment regions reinforced without unnecessary bulk?

Predicted Mass

Does the design place material only where it contributes to stiffness, stability, or connection strength?

Manufacturability

Can the parts print and laser cut reliably within the available material and class time?

Assembly & Access

Can M3 screws be installed and removed with normal hand tools?

Payload Volume

Does the design keep the interior open rather than filling it with oversized structural members?

Project Milestone

Today’s Required Deliverable

CubeSat Concept Selection Package

  • Weighted decision matrix comparing all three concepts.
  • Written justification for the selected design direction.
  • Detailed annotated sketch of the selected concept.
  • Preliminary overall and critical dimensions.
  • Initial M3 connection strategy.
  • List of questions that still must be resolved in CAD.
Engineering Decision

Document the Reasoning

Decision

What did your team decide today?

Evidence

What measurements, requirements, comparisons, calculations, or manufacturing information support that decision?

Reasoning

Why does that evidence make the decision appropriate for a lightweight structure that still has to qualify?

Resources

Lesson Resources

Project

CubeSat Unit 0 Overview

Review the complete challenge sequence, project rules, deliverables, and competition objective.

Course Hub

Principles of Engineering

Return to the POE hub for units, course resources, and certifications.