IED Unit 5 | Mission Brief 5.2

Sustainable Packaging for a Rocket Component

Design, build, and test sustainable packaging for a provided component.

Intermediate2-3 class periodsAerospace Mission
Background

Engineering Context

A precision rocket component must be shipped to a test site. The package must protect the part while minimizing material and waste.

Objectives

What You Will Practice

  • Balance protection and material use
  • Apply life-cycle thinking
  • Design packaging around a product
  • Use test evidence to revise a solution
Materials

What You Need

  • Provided rocket component or surrogate
  • Corrugated cardboard, paperboard, paper, or approved recycled material
  • Scale
  • Ruler
  • Drop-test area
  • Engineering notebook
Procedure

Instructions

  1. Measure the component and identify surfaces that must be protected.
  2. Define shipping hazards such as drop, vibration, abrasion, and moisture.
  3. Set criteria for protection, package size, mass, material type, and recyclability.
  4. Sketch three packaging concepts using minimal material.
  5. Select and build one concept.
  6. Record package mass and external dimensions.
  7. Perform three approved drop tests from increasing heights.
  8. Inspect the part and package, revise one feature, and retest.
Requirements

Engineering Requirements

  • Prevent visible damage in three approved drop tests
  • Use at least 70% recyclable or reusable material by mass
  • Use no loose plastic foam
  • Keep package volume below the teacher-set limit
  • Allow the component to be removed without damage
Constraints

Constraints & Safety

  • Use only approved drop heights and test area
  • No hazardous or messy filler
  • Component must be returned in original condition
  • Adhesive use must be measured or documented
Deliverables

What You Submit

  • Hazard and criteria list
  • Three concept sketches
  • Material and mass record
  • Final package
  • Drop-test results
  • Sustainability justification
  • Revision notes
Reflection

Reflection Questions

  1. Which hazard controlled the design?
  2. Where was material unnecessary?
  3. How did protection compete with sustainability?
  4. What would change for repeated shipping?