IED course icon
IED Unit 5 • Lesson 5.13

Data Analysis and Stakeholder Feedback Review

Focus question: How can engineers combine data and user feedback to decide what should improve?

Mission Briefing

Today’s Plan

Use this page with the lesson presentation, your engineering notebook, and the tools or evidence assigned for Combine Data and Stakeholder Feedback.

Learning Targets

  • Summarize test data and user feedback.
  • Identify patterns, strengths, weaknesses, and conflicts in the evidence.
  • Select revision priorities based on evidence.

Success Looks Like

You can analyze test data and stakeholder feedback to identify the most important revision priorities.

LaunchLearnApplyCheckSubmit
Opening Prompt

How can engineers combine data and user feedback to decide what should improve?

Connect your response to the decision, evidence, or quality standard required for Combine Data and Stakeholder Feedback.

Reveal: useful engineering move

This lesson is ready to move forward when the evidence meets this standard: Revision priorities are based on combined evidence and do not overvalue one isolated comment or trial.

Core Skill

What We Are Practicing

Key Idea 1

Data and feedback should be reviewed together.

Key Idea 2

Revision priorities should focus on the most important user need or performance issue.

Key Idea 3

A good design conclusion names both strengths and limitations.

Your Task

Combine Data and Stakeholder Feedback

Analyze quantitative results and qualitative feedback together to identify strengths, weaknesses, and revision priorities.

  1. Organize the performance data and feedback themes.
  2. Calculate or graph the required test results.
  3. Compare the evidence with each design criterion and user need.
  4. Rank the most important revision opportunities.

Quality check: Revision priorities are based on combined evidence and do not overvalue one isolated comment or trial.

Lesson Interactive

Combine Data and Stakeholder Feedback

Use quantitative results and repeated user comments to identify the revision that addresses the strongest evidence.

Evidence summary

  • Reliability: 19 successful cycles out of 20 — target ≥ 18/20
  • Setup time: 35 s mean — target ≤ 20 s
  • Comfort: 3 of 5 users rated the grip comfortable — target ≥ 4/5
  • Repeated comment: “The handle is hard to grasp with gloves.”
Find the metric that misses its target and connect it to the repeated stakeholder comment.
What You Will Submit

Evidence Review

  • One analysis summary containing results, feedback themes, and prioritized revisions.

Submission standard: Revision priorities are based on combined evidence and do not overvalue one isolated comment or trial.

Resources

Lesson Resources

Presentation

Lesson 5.13 PowerPoint

Use the lesson slides for guided practice, interactive checks, and the exit ticket.

Course Hub

Introduction to Engineering Design

Return to the IED course hub for units, resources, certifications, and current course information.