When you need many member forces
Isolate one joint at a time. Each planar joint provides ΣFₓ = 0 and ΣFᵧ = 0, so start at a joint with no more than two unknown member forces.
Best for: tracing the entire truss joint by joint.
Engineering question: How can we find forces in selected members of a larger truss without calculating every joint first?
Follow the learning modules in order. This lesson adds strategy and larger structures—not a new set of physical fabrication requirements.
The second video and additional practice may be assigned outside of class.
Both analysis methods use static equilibrium and ideal pin-jointed, joint-loaded, weightless two-force members.
Isolate one joint at a time. Each planar joint provides ΣFₓ = 0 and ΣFᵧ = 0, so start at a joint with no more than two unknown member forces.
Best for: tracing the entire truss joint by joint.
Imagine a cut through a small set of members. Isolate one side, replace each cut member with an unknown axial force and use ΣFₓ = 0, ΣFᵧ = 0 and ΣM = 0.
Best for: finding a key member without solving all the intermediate joints.
Important nuance: A section cut crossing three unknown member forces is the standard starting point, but three equations do not guarantee a solution. If the unknown lines of action are arranged so that the equations are dependent, choose another cut or combine methods.
These rules apply to ideal pin-jointed trusses with no applied external load or support reaction at the examined joint. The result is specific to that loading arrangement.
If a joint connects only two noncollinear members and has no external load or reaction, their forces must both be 0 N. Otherwise, they could not balance in two perpendicular directions.
At unloaded J, JA and JB lie on the same horizontal line; JC is vertical. The collinear forces cannot balance a nonzero vertical component.
Yes. An unloaded joint for these rules must have no external forces, including support reactions. A joint with a pin reaction is not automatically eligible even if no separate hanging weight is shown.
Use this method when the truss has more members than you want to solve individually.
Assume each cut member is in tension (arrows point outward from the isolated section along the member axis). Choose a moment center to eliminate unknowns, then solve horizontal and vertical equilibrium. A negative result means compression.
Cutting isn't removing support: Your free-body diagram includes all external loads and support reactions acting on the chosen side. Member forces appear only along members crossed by the cut. If you analyze the opposite side, their directions reverse.
These videos are from Jeff Hanson's statics course. The first demonstrates how and where to cut a truss; the second teaches zero-force-member shortcuts on a much larger truss.
Pause and try: At about 04:57, pause and trace the section cut. At about 07:52, explain how the moment center eliminates two unknown forces.
Watch on YouTube ↗Pause and try: At about 01:55 and 03:24, pause on each shortcut and check the joint load conditions before removing any members from the analysis.
Watch on YouTube ↗Videos contain longer university-level examples. You can complete this POE lesson using the simpler worked truss below.
Analyze an ideal five-joint, seven-member truss. The bottom joints A–B–C are at (0,0), (2,0) and (4,0) m. Top joints D and E are at (1,2) and (3,2) m. Pin A, roller C; downward loads 120 N at D and 80 N at E. Neglect member weight.
Take moments about A (CCW positive) so reactions at A disappear from that equation.
Cᵧ = (120 + 240)/4 = 90 N upward.
Aᵧ = 110 N upward. Aₓ = 0 N.
Both reactions add to 200 N, the total downward load.
The vertical yellow line crosses DE, BE and BC—three members. Keep the right side, with joints E and C, because it contains only one applied load (80 N) and one known reaction (90 N).
Assume unknown axial forces are tensile, pulling away from the right-hand section and toward the removed left-hand material.
Coordinates: E = (3,2), C = (4,0), B = (2,0). For member BE, the vector from E toward B is (−1, −2), of length √5 m.
There are three unknown axial forces: FDE points left, FBE points down-left, and FBC points left under the assumed-tension convention. The isolated right-hand portion also has its downward 80 N load at E and upward 90 N reaction at C.
Forces DE and BE pass through E, so their moments about E are zero. The 90 N reaction at C has a 1 m horizontal lever arm; the leftward force BC acts 2 m below E.
FBC = +45 N tension.
The positive result means the originally assumed tensile direction is correct.
FBE = 5√5 ≈ +11.18 N tension.
Its vertical component is −10 N, while its horizontal component is −5 N.
Substitute the two previously calculated results:
DE is in compression, magnitude 50 N. The result is negative because the assumed leftward tensile force is actually a rightward compressive force on this isolated right-hand portion.
| Member | Signed result under tension-positive convention | Final classification |
|---|---|---|
| BC | +45.00 N | Tension |
| BE | +11.18 N | Tension |
| DE | −50.00 N | Compression |
A section solves selected forces efficiently, but a separate joint balance is a valuable way to catch directional mistakes.
Joint A is easy because there are only two unknown members, AB and AD. Member AD rises 2 m over a 1 m run, so its component ratios are 2/√5 vertically and 1/√5 horizontally.
Thus FAD = −55√5 ≈ −122.98 N compression.
Thus FAB = +55.00 N tension.
Continue at joint B to verify the section results.
At B, the remaining diagonals have equal magnitudes but opposite classifications: FBD = −11.18 N compression and FBE = +11.18 N tension.
Keep geometry fixed and change either downward joint load. Select stages to see the section cut and examine the selected member-force calculation. Pay special attention to BE, which can change from tension to compression as the load distribution changes.
Load at D is larger, so BE is in tension.
The two downward joint loads balance the two upward support reactions. Take moments about A to find Cᵧ.
4Cᵧ − P_D(1) − P_E(3) = 0
Ideal pin-jointed truss with no member self-weight, loads only at D and E, and small static deformation. These are force calculations—not predictions of bending, failure or safe bridge capacity.
Set D = 80 N and E = 120 N. Predict the force in BE before checking the explorer.
BE becomes −11.18 N (compression). The sign switches because the right side now has a larger downward applied load than its upward support reaction; the member force reverses direction.
Set D = E = 100 N. What happens to BE under the ideal model? Does that mean removing it is a good design decision?
FBE = 0 N in this particular load case, by equilibrium. That does not establish that BE is unnecessary under different loading, out-of-plane stability demands, buckling prevention or a real bridge's load cases.
Use sketches and equations in your engineering notebook or 2.9 worksheet. Check your answer only after you have a reason for it.
Joint J connects exactly two noncollinear members. No applied load or reaction exists at J. What can you infer?
Both member forces equal 0 N for this idealized loading situation. Each noncollinear vector direction has no balancing partner.
Two noncollinear members meet at a pin support, and the pin carries a nonzero reaction. Can you immediately declare both members zero force?
No. The support reaction is an external force at that joint, so the unloaded-joint condition required by the shortcut is not satisfied.
You need one member force in a large, planar, statically determinate truss. Why might a cut crossing three members be better than solving ten other joints first?
The method of sections exposes only the cut-member forces on one isolated part. You can use the three independent planar equilibrium equations, if the geometry makes them sufficient.
Use the five-joint truss geometry from the worked example. Find Aᵧ and Cᵧ.
ΣMA = 4Cᵧ−80(1)−120(3)=0 ⇒ Cᵧ = 110 N. ΣFᵧ = Aᵧ+110−200=0 ⇒ Aᵧ = 90 N.
For D = 80 N, E = 120 N on the same truss, use the right-hand section cut through BC, BE and DE. State BC and BE with tension/compression.
Cᵧ=110 N. Taking moments about E: 110(1)−2FBC=0 ⇒ BC=+55 N tension. Vertical balance: 110−120−(2/√5)FBE=0 ⇒ BE=−5√5≈−11.18 N compression.
A force DE was assumed leftward on the isolated right-hand section, and the calculated answer was −50 N. What does the minus sign mean?
DE is in compression of magnitude 50 N. The actual force acts opposite the assumed tensile arrow on that side of the cut.
A 2D truss has j = 5 joints, m = 7 members and r = 3 independent external reactions. Does m + r = 2j guarantee the truss is stable?
The count 7 + 3 = 2(5) is satisfied. That is only a necessary simple counting condition; geometry or constraints may still create a mechanism or dependent equilibrium equations.
Your truss model predicts BE = 0 N when D and E both carry 100 N. Should BE automatically be deleted from your physical design?
No. A zero-force result is specific to the idealized load case and assumptions. BE can be engaged when loads shift, and it may help with real bracing, stability or buckling resistance.
These open engineering texts explain the same approaches using larger examples and interactive illustrations.
Open statics textbook, complete procedure and a cut-truss interactive illustration.
Engineering Statics — Section 6.5 ↗Two inspection rules with figures and a worked larger-truss example.
Engineering Statics — Chapter 6 ↗Return to the previous method and compare when it is more efficient than a section cut.
Engineering Statics — Section 6.4 ↗Section cut: imaginary boundary exposing internal forces. Moment center: point used to simplify rotational equilibrium. Collinear: lying on the same straight line. Zero-force member: axial force equal to zero for a specified ideal load case.
Submit the POE 2.9 Advanced Truss Analysis worksheet or teacher-directed notebook equivalent, showing your complete reasoning rather than copying a solved model from the site.
Due date: Check the Daily Agenda and your instructor's submission instructions.
Review lesson ↑