What You Already Know
Unit 1 showed that engineers use mechanisms to control force and motion. Unit 2 shifts the focus to structures: systems that must carry forces safely without moving very much.
Engineering question: How can a bridge span a gap, carry a required load, and remain lightweight and stiff?
Unit 1 showed that engineers use mechanisms to control force and motion. Unit 2 shifts the focus to structures: systems that must carry forces safely without moving very much.
Design and manufacture a lightweight bridge that spans a fixed gap between two supports. The engineering problem is to carry a centered load efficiently through members and joints into the supports.
Wood and plywood primary members, open-web single-piece laser-cut plywood side trusses, localized gussets, and approved PLA/PETG connectors are permitted. Only M3 nuts/bolts for mechanical fastening. No acrylic, screws, or fully printed bridges. See the complete Unit 2 specification.
Use these ideas as your lesson notes. Focus on explaining the behavior, not memorizing vocabulary by itself.
A mechanism is designed to move; a structure is designed primarily to carry loads while maintaining its shape. A bridge still flexes, but excessive deformation can make it unusable long before it actually breaks.
Strength describes how much load a material or structure can resist before yielding, fracturing, buckling, separating at a joint, or otherwise failing.
Stiffness describes resistance to deformation. A bridge may be strong enough not to break but still fail the design if its midspan deflection is too large under the required load.
Structural engineers cannot solve every problem by adding more material. A useful structure carries the required load with as little mass as practical.
Imagine Bridge A has a mass of 70 g and carries 45 N before failure. Bridge B has a mass of 45 g and carries 40 N. Bridge A is stronger in absolute load capacity, but Bridge B may be more structurally efficient because it carries nearly as much load with much less mass. Later in the unit you will quantify this tradeoff.
Use the printable mission-analysis sheet to capture criteria, constraints, initial bridge concepts, and need-to-know questions.
The resource opens in a clean print-friendly layout and can be printed or saved as a PDF from the browser.
This is the official starting record for the Unit 2 project, not a routine worksheet.
Format: Use the provided Bridge Mission Analysis template or complete the same evidence in your engineering notebook when directed.
In Lesson 2.2 you will identify the forces the bridge must resist and predict where early concepts are most likely to fail.
Because the bridge must also meet the stiffness/deflection requirement and mass limit. A structure can remain intact yet deform too much or be too heavy.
Added material usually increases strength or stiffness, but it also increases mass. Efficient structures must balance performance with mass.
Sketch two different open-web configurations and label how the midspan load reaches both supports.
Check your understanding: How will the 65 mm width limit affect cross-bracing and connector placement?
Bridge challenge connection: Apply this result to your planned 400 mm span, 65 mm maximum-width bridge; record evidence in your engineering notebook rather than assuming a design is compliant.